Hennepin county employee tells person to goto Buffalo,MN!

 HENNEPIN COUNTY TELLS INJURED PATIENT TO GOTO BUFFALO,MN AND COME BACK IN A FEW DAYS FOR SOME MORE HELP!

Hennepin county employee release patient from jail untreated to goto Buffalo,MN and return a few day's for more help! Help already received is listed above.

All the above mistakes and help is what got the injured untreated patient to Buffalo,MN and then they want him to come back in a few days for more help?

While in buffalo the patient and others were harmed which could have been prevented by Minnesota state statute 253b.05 https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=253B.05 . 

Which this should have been applied at H.C.M.C hospital Minneapolis,MN prior to the security staff being called at the adult psychiatric unit at the hospital. It should have been applied according to their own account of events in all reports. This law is designed to prevent harm to patients or others outside of the hospital. Especially in that unit where they are trained to follow the law in their own reports their are multiple reasons why this should be applied read medical reports, security report and police report and line 2 of the mn statute 253b.05 to see why it is not a choice of staff it is mandatory

Which they not only ignored the law they also broke it by injuring a injured patient which any patient is a vulnerable adult and especially when seeking mental health care!

THE FOLLOWING IS THE LEGAL RESPONSE FROM HENNEPIN COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER!

Above is page 1 from affidavit of Claire Schnurr on this first page of affidavit line one says there is no police report for buffalo,MN  does not exist case ICR#08010980 in line one. Which is false patient and others were harmed by the above listed violations of the law.

line 4 state patient was self referred to HCMC Acute Psychiatric services which is true patient was seeking mental health care and received 2 new injury's 1 to head, 1 to leg with chronic back pain. Where according to their own records should have been held there just for the mental health red flags in the report.

line 5 see security report patient needed security escort to leave property if you read medical report and security report they have conflicting story's patient is carried out of 1 room and placed into a wall where patient received a head injury. Consisting of a assault on patient since he was already restrained in room 1 and then placed into a wall while restrained.

Line 6 states that the police were called see police report

Line 7 -8 are claiming immunity which when they ignore the law or break it their immunity is void.

So basically their defence is admitting the patient went to the hospital seeking mental health care where they ignored https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=253B.05  MN state law. Assaulted the patient where it is confirmed in the police report and medical report confirms the patient was already injured from a prior assault.

Claire Schnurr claims the following report does not exist as part of the defense .

Legal response from Michael Miller Hennepin county,MN Sr. Assistant County Attorney 

line 3 claiming immunity once again the immunity is only granted if you are following the law.

In the statement of facts they are admitting the arguable fact of the head and leg injury given to patient by security. As stated in prior links see security reports link this was done illegally and in clear violation of MN state statute  https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/?id=253B.05

Feel free to contact this public servant and ask why this is acceptable treatment of anyone!
Michael miller Sr. Assistant county attorney 612-348-8299